Guido van Dijk
180361eda4
Eight step-by-step guides, appendices (design patterns, design card with eight filled-in examples, AI tools in education), facilitator guide and presentation. LeX Consultancy edition; screenshots from the Dutch build of the same apps. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
18 lines
2.6 KiB
HTML
18 lines
2.6 KiB
HTML
<section id="gdpraiact" data-transition="fade" style="background:#F7F4EC; color:#1E2A3A; font-family:'Nunito Sans', Verdana, sans-serif; padding:128px 128px 160px; display:flex; flex-direction:column; gap:40px">
|
|
<h2 style="font-family:'Rubik', Arial, sans-serif; font-size:64px; font-weight:600; line-height:1.1">GDPR and AI Act: what it means for today's apps</h2>
|
|
<div style="display:flex; gap:32px">
|
|
<div style="flex:1; display:flex; flex-direction:column; gap:14px; background:#FFFFFF; padding:32px; border:1px solid #D8D2C4; border-radius:16px">
|
|
<h3 style="font-family:'Rubik', Arial, sans-serif; font-size:34px; font-weight:600; color:#2563EB">GDPR</h3>
|
|
<ul style="font-size:26px; color:#3D4756; line-height:1.5"><li>The school is the controller; Dify and the model provider are processors, outside the EU</li><li>No data processing agreement (sandbox) = no personal data goes in</li><li>Personal data after all: a student's message to the teacher (Study coach). Then: legal basis, impact assessment, retention period for the logs</li></ul>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<div style="flex:1; display:flex; flex-direction:column; gap:14px; background:#FFFFFF; padding:32px; border:1px solid #D8D2C4; border-radius:16px">
|
|
<h3 style="font-family:'Rubik', Arial, sans-serif; font-size:34px; font-weight:600; color:#D9480F">EU AI Act</h3>
|
|
<ul style="font-size:26px; color:#3D4756; line-height:1.5"><li><b>Art. 4</b>: AI literacy mandatory for whoever uses AI (since Feb 2025). This workshop is such a measure</li><li><b>Prohibited</b>: emotion recognition in education</li><li><b>High risk</b>: admission, assessing learning outcomes, proctoring. Our apps decide nothing about people; a coach that assesses students would</li><li><b>Art. 50</b>: a chatbot says it is AI</li></ul>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</div>
|
|
<p style="font-size:26px; color:#3D4756; line-height:1.4">Rule of thumb: as soon as an app decides or records something about a person, the question changes from "does it work?" to "is it allowed, and who is responsible?" State of play September 2026; check your national assessment framework for the current picture.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p style="position:absolute; left:128px; bottom:64px; font-size:24px; color:#8A8F98">Workshop AI Agents with Dify · LeX Consultancy · CC BY-SA 4.0</p><img src="../images/logo-lex.png" alt="LeX Consultancy" style="position:absolute; right:128px; bottom:52px; width:90px; height:52px; object-fit:contain">
|
|
<aside>Not as a legal lecture. Two sentences per side. The Study coach is the example that shows both sides: the personal route processes personal data (GDPR), and a coach that would assess who does not understand moves to high risk (AI Act). That is a design choice.</aside>
|
|
</section>
|